Catwalks trade on clothing with sex appeal
not for sale
Source : Melbourne Age
Date : 21 Jul 2001
Australia, At her most recent fashion show, models for Melbourne designer
Bettina Liano hit the catwalk with breasts and buttocks bouncing, in sheer mesh
tops and micro-shorts not much bigger than two sheets of A4.
Liano is renowned for her sexy, high-voltage fashion shows and sexy,
high-voltage fashion. But, look for those mesh tops and micro shorts on the
racks at her South Yarra shop and you won't find them.
"They're not there," says Liano. "After the show, I'll send
something like that to the magazines, and they'll shoot them on some gorgeous
girls, but that's about it. You wouldn't want to pay the rent from stuff like
that."
See-through tops and frocks and overtly sexy fashions are a regular feature
of catwalk shows lately, but they don't sell at retail level. Mark Burnett, of
local label Princess Highway, says: "They aren't what I'd call reality
pieces. Audiences might look at them and say `hey, beautiful', but they're not
going to wear them."
But, maybe it doesn't matter. Karen Webster, head of RMIT's fashion
department, says sex is part of the catwalk's new purpose and that's not always
about sales any more.
"Traditionally, the catwalk was there to sell product to a customer. But
it's more aspirational than informative now; it's saying; `If you buy this,
you'll get your man.' It's promoting a concept more than a product, and it has
to compete using shock tactics and sex."
Less than five years ago, a see-through top could make a fashion show
audience gasp. Now, they're commonplace and not an eyelid bats when they appear.
The audiences have also changed from mostly girls and women previewing
product for a fashion shopping spree, to often rowdy, mixed crowds, out to be
entertained as much as informed about what's in for spring. Retail-based events
like the Melbourne Fashion Festival, Spring Fashion Week and the Wella
Australian Designer Collections trade on this new role of fashion.
"It's like another sexual revolution and it's being youth lead,"
says events director for the Wella Australian Designer Collections, Valentina
Jovanoska. She sees fashion shows' overt sexuality as evidence that Australia is
growing up. "We're coming to terms with sexual behavior, or at least,
younger people are. It's becoming more like Europe."
Liano has a simpler theory. "The whole (fashion) industry is part of
show biz," she says. "And, if I tend toward sexy shows, it's because
that's what I'm known for and that's what people find more entertaining and
exciting."
Liano is also convinced of a direct link between sex and the appeal of
fashion shows to a mixed audience. "Men wouldn't even be interested unless
there was that element. In fact, I don't think women would be either. We all
want it."
Gwendolynne Burkin, of the Gwendolynne fashion label, says she first noticed
how sex works on an audience at a fashion show by local menswear designer Arthur
Galan, of AG: "I went with a girlfriend and, we were so surprised! It was
very sexy; we were quite titillated. All these beautiful young guys - my heart
rate just kept going up."
Burkin maintains that sexuality and sensuality on the catwalk are two very
different qualities that are regularly confused. At her Australian Fashion Week
show, she included a webbed top made from her sponsor Autore's pearls that left
the model's breasts otherwise completely bare. Her intention was sensuality.
"I chose a model with very white skin and red hair - I didn't put the
pearls on a tanned, blonde bombshell - that would have sent a different message.
I was making a statement about women's beauty, not sex."
Despite Burkin's and other designers' best intentions, there is no doubt of
the intentions of media photographers, whose shutters make a louder din than
usual every time bared breasts or bouncing buttocks appear. "There's a fine
line between the sensuality I express, and sexuality," Burkin says.
"But the men - and photographers at those shows are mostly men - don't
really get it."
Does it matter, though? "Oh well, I suppose, it gets them snapping -
that can't be bad."
|